 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
Energy We are due for a boost in our capabilities, comparable to the last era of change which propelled us into the industrial age and further into our modern era of global communication and information processing. In truth, it takes little more than just changing how we think of things. It's the nature of the cycle. Long ago, when we realized that the Earth was a sphere revolving around the Sun, versus a flat something with the Sun passing regularly overhead, we opened a huge range of possibility from the previous impossibilities. We are definitely doing this again. Every bit of investigation leading up to Einstein and now, has been important, even the things which were proven to be completely inaccurate. Trial and error is a reasonable method and sooner or later the error is tried for the right number of times and becomes a workable answer. Then, we use that answer for a while until we break it with another one. Part of our new paradigm will involve Force, as in the Unified Force or Unified Field Theory being so fervently sought within the scientific community. From there we will develop ways to generate and use energy which we can scarely dream of with today's expensive and damaging energy methods. However, we have a hurdle to jump first and unfortunately, we cannot leap until we realize what is and is not holding our feet to the ground. We have been operating under a fallacy about Gravity now for some time. We are under the impression that Gravity is a force of attraction. We even have equations to prove how Gravity sticks us to this planet. Oddly enough, when we turn those equations around to involve two space bodies or such, we tend to more accurately describe the process, but we still work it as if Gravity pulls. Gravity is non-existent as we use the term today. Gravity is NOT the acceleration of falling bodies. Gravitation is the deceleration of falling bodies. We know that Magnetism is a centripetal force, pulling toward the center or core, regardless of pole operation. If Gravity ALSO pulled toward the center or core, the Earth would have been a black hole already, drawing unto itself everything in its reach. The Moon would never stay aloft. I refuse to use the term Gravity as a force because it is not that at all. It's just an uninformed measurement of the resultant of force. More on 'Gravity' later. Gravitation is a push, or put another way, a pulling-away-from. It is the equal and opposite of Magnetism. In fact, these two form ONE FORCE. Magnetism and Gravity are related, paired, complements of each other. You could say that Magnetism pulls inward, while Gravitation pushes outward. You could say that Magnetism and Gravitation are always pulling OR pushing at each other. Regardless, they are simply two aspects of the same force, operating in Equal and Opposite Reaction to each other. What happened to Electricity? It was only recently combined with Magnetism to be perceived as Electromagnetic Force. Well, Electricity is a product of the pull-push of Magnetism and Gravitation, the excitation of that exchange, if you will. Conversely, the pull-push of those two aspects of the one force is also fueled by the Electricity they produce, and so there is an infinite energy loop which spans the Universe. The scientific community seems to believe there are two more forces: Weak and Strong. I find this almost funny, but I guess it was as good an explanation as any. There is indeed a strength factor involved, as is true with any two anythings interacting. In this case, the real situation seems obvious, at least now that I've seen it. Centripetal Force is actually not "a force" but explains one behavior of a force, such as Magnetism. A centripetal behavior causes the force to draw closer to its own field, its own center, core or axis. Conversely, centrifugal behavior is when the force pushes outward or pulls away from the center, core or axis. Centripetal grows stronger as it draws tighter, and gets weaker further out away from the center. Centrifugal grows weaker toward the center but builds strength as it extends further out. Momentum functions for both sides of that mirror. Weak Force and Strong Force are simply behavioral conditions of the one force. Fine, but what drives it all? If these terms we've been using are just behaviors and parameters, then what IS the ONE FORCE? Electromagnetigravicentripefugalsomething? No. Spiral Energy. It's all about the spin. The Universe and everything and every no-thing within it... spins. Spin is the catalyst for all energy, being Spiral Energy. A spiral line is a one-dimensional line helping to define a two-dimensional plane, usually a circular shape, but with possible variations. As this spiral line divides the plane on which it exists, it essentially marks off two co-existing or simultaneous planes as one plane. In fact, the two cannot exist without each other nor without the 'line' which defines them or the field which signifies/constitutes their joining. With Spiral Energy, one portion of the plane is akin to Magnetism and would be much more content for the spiral to pull in on itself, going back to a single generation point (although it would never quite get there. ref: black holes). When Spiral Energy is three-dimensional (always), then Magnetism flows in alignment with the axis of spin and yet still strongly concerns itself with that point of origin or core. The other portion of the described plane is akin to Gravitation and perpetually pushes (or pulls away) to extend the plane as far as possible. Gravitation functions on the plane of spin, even in three dimensions. In that case, it is also concerned with the axis, as any point on the axis is the center of that circular plane of spin. However, Gravitation is not concerned with the central or core point of the whole field, other than pulling away from it, which it does relative to Magnetism's pull combined with the centrifugal direction of the plane of spin. Thus Gravitation operates on a perpendicular angle to Magnetism and it's only Magnetism which prevents Gravitation to break free completely. Between these two aspects of the Spiral Energy field is their point of contact, the 'line' representing the energy generated by the race of Equal and Opposite Reactions. We have been using this resultant to define the whole field and called it Electromagnetism, or Electricity, or Magnetism, depending on where and how we find it, yet much mystery remains and that's because we hadn't factored in Gravitation properly, mostly because we just haven't understood it. But, we should be able to see now that the two aspects of the Spiral Energy force travel together, as Gravitation expands while Magnetism contracts. They are inexorably paired to do this together, but not precisely equal, as each subsequent loop in an unhindered spiral naturally grows larger. But why? Because expansion favors Gravitation, because centrifugal behavior includes a strengthening over distance from the center. Expansion weakens Magnetism, as is the case for centripetal behavior, and thus the ultimate victor is Gravitation --- at least until it must respond to an outside force, such as another Spiral Energy field. Then it gets really interesting. Even more interesting is the realization that a three-dimensional spiral allows the electromagnetic charge or field to flow in both directions at once, clockwise and counterclockwise, up and down, plus the around and around of the centrifugal Gravitational aspect. But, I digress into further complications. Basically, if Magnetism exerts any effort at all, then Gravitation must answer it, then Magnetism answers that call to action, which Gravitation must return, and so on and so on. Any Indy driver will tell you that in Racing, there is rubbing (bumping) and that's friction, which is a form of electrical energy. Both the action and the reaction charge up the resultant field. Does the Magnetism/Gravitation race actually cause the current to flow, or visa versa? Does it matter? The race and associated current began at the origin of the Universe and it shall continue on through infinity. In fact, if Gravitation had its way, infinity would indeed be an ever-expanding infinity. Magnetism is surely working in the other direction. I presume that sometimes one may have a slight edge, sometimes the other, but overall, the expansion is evident. Certainly most of what we perceive is a result of a Gravitational win. That portion of the Spiral Force has given a body dimension, form, mass, etc. We're unlikely to encounter the Magnetism victories except vicariously. I note again that black holes are evidence that sometimes Magnetism does win. This brings me to Space and Time. These are entirely relative concepts. Neither is fixed nor absolute. They can only be ratios for gauging Action/Reaction and considered for a specified realm of influence. There will likely always be miniscule and undeterminable values which affect the outcome of these calculations, but there can be a dividing line of "negligibility" and the calculations will still be more than functional for application. We simply must get over the entire notion of |absolutes|. There absolutely are none. I am not a mathmatician. I am a philosopher and theorist, but I cannot do the math proofs. I only know intuitively that this is workable and there will be proofs soon. With that disclaimer, I submit that the ratio for Space-Time may be Phi Ø (1.618...) and Pi is surely a player too, but mostly when needed for vector calculations of combined force. Spiraling occurs in nearly everything if we're observant, and the value of Phi is involved with growth or recursion. I do not know mathmatically that Phi is the energy signature of the Universe, but I feel fairly certain that it is. I see the Universe as an infinite fractal of spirals, from the smallest anything to Everything. It makes sense for even that seeming chaos to be guided by one or a few basic principles or laws, such as Equal and Opposite Reaction. I would also suspect that Occam's Razor is at work in the cosmos, such that one rule of recursion, always and forever, with one magic little ratio, is a lot easier than all the manipulations we do with such things mathmatically. I think it's all much simpler, but our learning curve has made it seem overly complex. I do know that there must be a 'time' delay in the interactions between forces and even within a force field. This delay may be smaller than we can possibly hope to quantify accurately, but there is surely a time factor involved. If there were no time delay, there could be no reaction in response to an action. Action and action could take place but unrelated to each other. So, there is Time, but it is relative, it is more task-dependent than a measure of a mythical base unit. With this understanding, actions per cycle would make more sense than cycles per second, because a 'second' is a nearly arbitrary unit of time, or perhaps relative to something which may or may not have anything to do with the actions or cycles being measured. Speaking of mythical units, Gravity may be quantifiable but I say again that it merely represents the difference or combination of the Magnetic influence and the Gravitational influence. While a person standing on the surface of the Earth is being pulled to it by Magnetism, they are also being pushed outward or pulled away by Gravitation. Thus "Gravity" quantifies how much Magnetism is losing the taffy pull and/or how much Gravitation is winning. Therefore, Gravity is the value describing the deceleration of the person, whom Magnetism would like to have squashed against the surface. Magnetism has the person's feet fairly securely, but since their head is a bit further away, Magnetism is at a slight disadvantage there, while the same differential gives aid and an edge to Gravitation. If Gravitation was suddenly compromised, then the person would indeed fall to Earth. We do this when we over-balance. We know it as lowering our 'center of gravity' and that's essentially what happens. We shorten the balancing distance which otherwise allows us to walk upright. Over-balancing or tilting transfers a bit of that edge from the Gravitation (push) side and hands it summarily to the Magnetic (pull) side and we fall, or flail and wobble until we find the equilibrium again. As most of us know, it's a lot more difficult to get up, than down. We have to escape Magnetism and stretch up into a Gravitational level we can use. I also believe that small people, ala children, not only have the difficulty of learning to operate muscles in a coordinated fashion, they have to practice a lot to learn how to overcome Magnetism, not Gravity. Gravitation is a helper. Gravitation would like to have us all floating out there somewhere. Fortunately Magnetism helps keep us within the breathing zone. Back to the point of relativity, Space is also a relative factor, as noted. I have further theories on the nature of Matter, but for now let us assume there is such a thing. Whether a spiral of energy is occupying Matter or not, it is taking up space. It surely must have volume, with or without density or mass? It is three-dimensional, whether or not it is material. After that, how much space it takes up is forever relative to the size of the Universe and the interaction with all other spirals of energy close enough for influence. In fact, the Universe is full, all the time, regardless of size. So, how much space is occupied by one unit of spiral energy? There is no absolute answer for this, ever. There are only answers regarding the significant interactions between fields and/or matter and only that under relatively narrow parameters. We'll just have to let the equations indicate those approaches to infinity and zero, while we find the practical ranges to match ordinary three-dimensional experience. How Spiral Energy fields interact is most assuredly the same for particles and/or waves, or for any quantum. However, it's much easier to see and discuss the big objects and systems. The sphere has to be the most widely used shape in the Universe. The reason for this is the same in Space as it is here on Earth. It's about pressure or an equivalent field effect. If all things are relative to all things then any body within the Universe is being acted upon by all bodies within the Universe, albeit in varying proportions, and including non-material 'energy bodies'. Generally, these influences equalize into a spherical shape. Truthfully, all the Magnetism will pull just as far and as strong as anything else will let it. Gravitation's push is equally as aggressive, but of course with a push. So, when the Earth formed, there was the internal struggle to find her own balance of force, while everyone else in the neighborhood had their say too. The Sun was of course one of the loudest, but everyone in the solar system and beyond got their votes in. As with most natural satellites, the Earth took on her rounded form. Gravitation however found an edge, literally. This horizontal aspect of the Spiral Force will always operate strongest on the outer edge of the widest circle on the plane of spin, aka the equator. Now the sphere can become a bit compressed and heavier or wider in the middle, IF the Earth's magnetic force weakens or IF the Sun's electromagnetic radiation flags or IF the galaxy's ecliptic interfers or IF Jupiter's proximaty is influential, etc etc etc. Gravitation continues to push out stronger around the middle and notably more on the surface of the globe, while the Magnetism pulls in response but along the axis, actually assisting with the pumpkin shape. The magnetic field is stronger at the poles still because gravitation is weaker there, being smaller circles for centrifugal force. However, at some point, the bulging broadens the circles enough to allow the balance to find a stasis, until other infinite factors spinning in the cosmos change the whole game again. Next in Sequence Select From Menu |
 |
|
|
|||
 uicksilver
|
|